martes, 10 de marzo de 2020

Simposio "Esfera pública y religión. Relaciones mutuas en la Historia, Educación y Sociedad" Madrid, 4-5 de marzo de 2020


La universidad se encuentra ante la mejor ocasión de recordar a las ciencias los fundamentos inmateriales pero reales de lo que existe. 


El 4 y 5 de marzo de 2020, tuvo lugar en el campus de Madrid de la Universidad de Navarra el Simposio Esfera Pública y Religión. Relaciones mutuas en la Historia, Educación y Sociedad, organizado por el Instituto Cultura y Sociedad (ICS).

Los asistentes han conformado una representación de todas las generaciones de investigadores y docentes académicos, de varias disciplinas universitarias y de diferentes universidades de cinco países.

El programa estaba muy bien trazado, engastado sobre un recorrido cronológico que ha servido de soporte para la profundización en el debate intelectual. Las dimensiones social y religiosa del hombre y se reflejan en la vida civil, y en el derecho que la regula. Desde las dificultades de conciliar conciencia, libertad y poder estatal en autores como Kant, Weber y Nietzsche hasta la pedagogía del Aprendizaje – servicio (Service – learning) de sello ignaciano en las universidades jesuitas en el siglo XXI. El mundo educativo se convierte en actor de primera línea para la base de convivencia política y social que incluya el fuero interno.
El debate final reclamó la presencia del Maestro en las leyes y su inclusión en los requisitos de calidad que valoran los ránkings de universidades. La financiación económica, pública y privada, se reveló fundamental, ambas en iniciativa integrada. La posmodernidad exige superar el atrincheramiento de la ciencia en lo puramente empírico; las ciencias naturales reclaman salir del positivismo científico declarado insuficiente.

La supervivencia de la universidad y la crisis sobre su misión es un hecho. Las nuevas formas de adquisición rápida de información parecen poner contra la pared a la reflexión y el estudio, actividades del docente e investigador universitario que necesitan tiempo para formar un poso de cultura. En efecto, un diagnóstico
algo pesimista que finalmente los intervinientes han logrado superar, señalando los valores que la universidad contiene en sí para salir de un angosto túnel.


Precisamente éste es su momento fuerte. La universidad se encuentra ante la mejor ocasión de recordar a las ciencias los fundamentos inmateriales pero reales de lo que existe. Este impulso abre a la física, la genética, la inteligencia artificial… La excelencia que sobrepasa el conocimiento puramente empírico, porque no satisface el asombro y curiosidad de la mente, del corazón. El natural espíritu creador del hombre sólo se conforma con lo que le abre a la conquista de lo infinito.

Consciente de trabajar a largo plazo, sin someterse a la economía laboral y productiva, trabaja para todas las personas, en todos los sectores profesionales, aglutinando todas las dimensiones humanas.

Lía Viguria Guerendiain
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

miércoles, 26 de febrero de 2020

Mercedes Montero publica "Historia de Ediciones Rialp"

Una historia de Rialp, desde la postguerra hasta nuestros días


El próximo 2 de marzo sale a la venta el último libro de la Prof. Mercedes Montero, Historia de Ediciones Rialp: Orígenes y contexto, aciertos y errores, publicado por la misma editorial objeto de estudio. El libro recoge la historia de una de las editoriales más antiguas de España, todavía independiente. Relata la génesis de la empresa desde los difíciles años cuarenta, descubre a su
antecesora -Editorial Minerva- y llega hasta nuestros días, en el marco del complicado panorama del libro en un panorama “ tech” y globalizado. Ediciones Rialp fue consolidándose en poesía (colección y premio Adonais para jóvenes poetas), humanidades, ensayo y espiritualidad (con Patmos). Las dificultades no faltaron en ningún momento de su vida: tensiones con Iglesia y Estado, dificultades económicas, censura y falta de medios técnicos, todo ello en un contexto de dictadura. Llegaron enseguida los premios, cambiaron los tiempos con la democracia y se impusieron novedades editoriales como las enciclopedias o los coleccionables. La supervivencia no fue fácil pero en la actualidad sigue su camino con una personalidad bien consolidada y contribuyendo a construir el entramado cultural de nuestra sociedad.

Mercedes Montero es licenciada y doctora tanto en Comunicación como en Historia, por la Universidad de Navarra, donde es profesora titular de Periodismo. Especialista en historia de la comunicación y de las mujeres, entre sus publicaciones se cuentan Historia de la ANC d P: la construcción del Estado confesional (1936-1941) (Eunsa), Cultura y comunicación al servicio de un régimen: Historia de la ACN de P entre 1945 y 1959 (Eunsa), La conquista del espacio público: Mujeres españolas en la universidad (1910-1936) (Minerva) y En vanguardia: Guadalupe Ortiz de Landázuri (1916-1975) (Rialp). La Prof. Montero es colaboradora interna del grupo "Religión y sociedad civil" del ICS.

Rafael Escobedo
Colaborador interno ICS

martes, 25 de febrero de 2020

Becoming an Independent Practical Reasoner in an Organizational Context: MacIntyre, Management, and Integral Human Development

According to MacIntyre, individuals may find threatened their development of autonomy when inside corporations. However, recent considerations concerning knowledge-intensive organizations offer a more complex picture.


In Dependent Rational Animals, Alasdair MacIntyre presents an account moral development such that agents move from being potentially independent practical reasoners to becoming actually
independent practical reasoners by participating in social practices. In such contexts, agents gain the capacity to distinguish between what they desire at any given time and what is good. Likewise, they become capable of distinguishing between reasons for action and good reasons for action, develop a capacity to imagine realistic alternatives, and ultimately gain a desire to pursue ends insofar as they are good.

MacIntyre, along with many others, have thought that this picture of moral development, i.e., the development of autonomy, is threatened by contemporary organizations, especially for-profit corporations. Within formal organizations, participants’ autonomy may be threatened by hierarchical relationships that focus on increasing efficiency or productivity by marginalizing other normative considerations, specifically the demands of the virtues. Participants may be encouraged (or required) to ignore concerns about the common good, or the flourishing of organization members, insofar as these concerns do not contribute to organizational performance.

Without denying the prevalence of this sort of phenomenon within contemporary organizations, more recent considerations concerning knowledge-intensive organizations offer a more complex picture of the nature of contemporary firms. Contemporary knowledge intensive organizations involve heterogeneous forms of knowledge, both tacit and firm-specific forms of knowledge, and various forms of scientific knowledge, that are combined and developed by organization members to create novel goods and services. In this context, managers are typically unable to aggregate all necessary knowledge and must instead rely upon the judgment of organization members. Managers must aim to facilitate collaboration and implement best practices in a way that empowers and supports organization members. Likewise, knowledge-intensive organizations must give members a greater role in defining organizational goals, and those organizations that place a greater focus on the way that they contribute positively to the common good typically have a greater ability to motivate members, and to marshal the organization’s distributed knowledge in a way that is mutually beneficial for both internal and external stakeholders.

The knowledge-intensive, or collaborative, organization offers new possibilities for explaining the importance of the virtues within organizations, since the virtues are needed to promote cooperation and organizational learning, and to preserve a focus on the benefits conferred upon stakeholders. By appreciating these characteristics of contemporary organizations and taking steps to increase their prevalence, such organizations can become key locations for moral development, enabling participants to become independent practical reasoners.

Caleb Bernacchio
IESE Business School PhD student

jueves, 23 de enero de 2020

Postmodern Identity Politics and the Social Tyranny of the Definable



Beyond the proliferating multiplicity of identities in the contemporary political arena based on cultures, languages, regions, religions, nations, sexes, classes, and special interests, what makes us truly one without limits, without exclusions and restrictions—is nothing. Precisely Nothing. And nothing is more important for us to grasp than this, in order to be able to live together on our shrinking, globalized planet. This nothing is the nothing specifiable or stateable of the single individual, the person herself or himself intimated or divined behind or beyond all categories and groupings into which his or her specific differences can be fit. It is the nakedness of our person. That is what is truly universal. All fundamentally are this nakedness: in it alone, all are equal. Without any support from outside, without superiority of class, gender, race, or social standing, the naked self stands alone in the dignity of having nothing to disguise it or to answer for it, no alibi but itself. As such, each of us can stand out, ex-ist (from the Greek ἵστημι, to stand or make stand) in the full stature of our uniqueness and, at the same time, our universality.  This is a universality of being nothing—nothing that can be said or specified. 

William Franke
Vanderbilt University

lunes, 13 de enero de 2020

Of Garden and Time: The Power of Eve’s Romanesque Body


Set in the Garden of Eden, Eve’s history marks the beginning of the history of women, and her fall is the primeval story of humankind. Her figure and character shape human identity, which is grounded in the earth.
Lintel fragment of Eve from Autun Cathedral, ca. 1120, now in Rolin Museum. Photo © A.-M. Moubayed

I
n Genesis, God first created Adam and then Eve from Adam’s rib to serve as his female counterpart and companion (Genesis 2:23-25). The first man and woman were destined to live eternally, deprived of shame in Eden, the garden of God. They were free to eat fruit from any tree, except the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil; however, symbol of chaos and the underworld, a serpent – the Devil disguised – seduced Eve and persuaded her to eat the forbidden fruit from the tree, which she also offered to Adam, bringing about the Original Sin (Genesis 3:1-10). Eve’s curiosity and vanity spark the fall of humanity; her and Adam’s disobedience to God resulted in their expulsion from Paradise, after which they and their descendants would experience pain, evil, and death.  In this biblical narrative, Eve triggers the fall of humanity, as she is depicted as its main protagonist.
Traditionally unclothed, the figure of Eve made a sudden appearance on highly visible areas in interiors and exteriors of churches throughout Europe, built during the great architectural effervescence of ca. 1100, now characterized as the ‘Romanesque.’ Adapted, re-read, and sexualized in the medieval period, the story of Eve advanced agendas surrounding sex and gender. She became a plastic translation of socio-religious ideology, which imagined her body as a site of sin. Eve’s presence on the Romanesque portal re-enacts and narrates the history of humanity as created by God where time, as Saint Augustine explains, has neither understandable boundaries nor measure:

In eternity nothing moves into the past: all is present (totum esse praesens). Time, on the other hand, is never all present at once… What then is time? If no one asks me, I know. If I wish to explain it to someone that asks, I do not know... It is now plain and evident that neither future nor past things exist. Nor can we properly say, “there are three times: past, present, and future.” Instead, we might properly say: “there are three times: a present-of-things-past, a present-of-things-present, and a present-of-things-future.”[1]

Eternal time belongs to God’s Knowledge, which was lost by Eve and her descendants when she ate the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. The three times — past (memory/memoria), present (observation/contuitus), future (expectation/intentio) — are defined by a presence of things in an eternal setting, where the past, present, and future alone do not exist, yet their presence does.[2]
French philosopher Paul Ricœur presents an extensive study of the relationship between temporality and narrativity to explain Saint Augustine’s understanding of time and his unsuccessful attempt to explain effectively its nature. Ricœur’s analysis of Augustine’s Book 11 focuses on the pairing between intentio animi (distention of the soul by time: the soul’s passive subjectivity of time) and intentio (the intention: the soul’s ability to act freely in time), with which Saint Augustine struggles to measure time.[3]  The philosopher’s main argument is that time and narrative are interdependent:

Ultimately at stake in the case of the structural identity of the narrative function as well as in that of the truth claim of every narrative work, is the temporal character of human experience. The world unfolded by every narrative is always a temporal world… between the activity of narrating a story and the temporal character of human experience there exists a correlation that is not merely accidental but that presents a transcultural form of necessity.[4]

Ricœur also states that “time becomes human to the extent that it is articulated through a narrative mode, and narrative attains its full meaning when it becomes a condition of temporal existence.”[5]  Time, as we perceive it, is thus measured in terms of the memory and expectations and memory of the past things and the future.[6]  The history of humanity and its three temporal intentions — past, present, future ⁠— as well as God’s eternal time are commemorated on the Romanesque façade to serve the memory and expectations of medieval Christians, who understood the measurement of time as a human construct.[7]  Starting in the Garden of Eden, with Eve’s Original Sin and leading to God’s Incarnation, Sacrifice and Redemption on an eternal time line, the early events of humanity write its end. Taking roots in Eve’s Original Sin, it is this clear, and yet complex idea that is frequently articulated on Romanesque portals across Europe. Eve’s acquisition of power through knowledge, her display of flesh and the emphasis it places on sexuality generated a domino effect, leading Adam to sin, which culminated in their loss of the Garden of Eden.
Temptation and Fall of Adam and Eve, ca. 1150, Poitiers Cathedral. Photo © A.-M. Moubayed

Our human condition, from the perspective of the Western tradition, has been portrayed in terms of our understanding of Eden. The idea of Eden, or Paradise, fuels our imagination and creativity, as it did for the medieval monastic communities who developed Eve’s iconography and for the churchgoers who gazed upon historiated Romanesque portals in their quest for perfection. It is from this primeval story that features a mysterious tree and talking snake that once made Eve and then Adam drift away towards sorrow, pain, and the flesh's earthliness, that our human condition is constructed. Within this story, the garden is the space where our morality, sexuality, status, and gender roles, as well as our artistic and literary traditions, are defined. In that light, Romanesque sculptural programs reflect humankind’s quest for perfection and identity in narrating Messianic Redemption, where Eve and her flesh play a powerful leading role in shaping Western socio-religious and visual culture.

Anna-Maria Moubayed, PhD
Concordia University, Canada



[1] Saint Augustine, Confessions 11:13,14, 20.
[2] Ibid., 11:20, 26.
[3] Paul Ricœur, Time and Narrative, vol.1, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984), 7. See also: Saint Augustine, Confessions, 11: 28, 38.
[4] Ibid., 3, 152.
[5] Ibid., 52.
[6] Ibid., 21.
[7] Donald J. Wilcox, The Measure of Times Past: Pre-Newtonian Chronologies and the Rhetoric of Relative Time (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987), 137.